Author: a few of the reviewer’s remarks were therefore defectively written, just how can he be described as a judge that is good of!
- It is correct that numerous reviewers would not have English as their very very first language. Possibly they discovered your English had been tough to realize, or maybe they certainly were afraid that other reviewers would point this out and felt ashamed when they failed to state any such thing in regards to the English language. Some non-English speakers feel it might conserve face should they criticised the language.
Writer: You asked a colleague through the US to see your paper in which he stated it had been fine!
- Probably the English in your paper had been okay, but simply not adequate enough for book. Possibly your colleague had been wanting to be good, and would not would you like to state he thought the English had been inadequate. Possibly your colleague didn’t would like to get stuck utilizing the work of re-writing your paper. Maybe he simply didn’t comprehend your paper and didn’t would you like to acknowledge it.
Writer: you would imagine the reviewer is judging your English more harshly since it’s from Asia.
- Many journals run a “blind” peer review, in other words. any such thing pinpointing the writer is taken away before delivering for review. Nevertheless, you will find usually clues inside the paper, such as for example mentions of past magazines, or of Chinese research. Additionally any native English presenter will choose through to English that simply will not appear normal to him, regardless of if theoretically grammatical – have you figured out any Us americans who are able to write perfect Chinese?
List of positive essay-writing actions
- Have you any idea a person with exceptional English whom you could ask to help you from the English in your paper? Preferably, this will be a person who knows the subject material of one’s paper, or at the very least is knowledgeable about the needs of systematic book.
- Make use of the solutions of an organization like ISE, with a track that is proven of English language modifying for scientific documents. For more information, call us only at
Just how to react:
- We regret there have been issues with the English. The paper happens to be very very very very carefully revised by [a indigenous English presenter]/[a professional language modifying service] to boost the sentence structure and readability.
Reviewer: There’s nothing brand brand new in this paper.
Author: Of course there is certainly! Didn’t it was read by him properly?
- Maybe this got lost within the detail of this paper whenever you published it. Numerous writers get caught up composing their techniques and outcomes, with an abundance of information, but forget to incorporate a conclusion that is strong.
- Perchance you would not like to boast a lot of about your findings, or thought that it had been apparent that the outcomes revealed a major step of progress.
- Maybe you didn’t talk about other research in the region, either as you assumed the reviewer could be knowledgeable about it, or perhaps you failed to wish to draw focus on comparable work. Perhaps the reviewer thought you had been perhaps maybe perhaps not conscious of this research.
- Perhaps there really isn’t anything new in pursuit. For the reason that situation, it really is unlikely getting posted. But clearly there will be something a new comer to report: a more substantial research team, a method that is different learn populace?
Do the following
- Keep in mind that numerous editors state that the no. 1 reason behind rejecting a paper is really because it doesn’t provide one thing brand new. Although many research builds on work done before, nobody would like to spend your time reading about research that doesn’t show any such thing brand brand new. Consequently it must be made by you clear what exactly is brand new regarding the research findings.
- Read your paper very very carefully to recognize places where you might make clear what exactly is brand brand new.
- Pay particular focus on the abstract, conversation and summary (or concluding sentences)
- Include additional information in regards to the implications of one’s research
- If required, atart exercising . increased detail about other research in this area that is subject and exactly how your quest varies with this. Discuss conflicting research.
Just how to react:
- Many thanks because of this feedback that is valuable.
research [is the first ever to show that…]/[confirms the findings of White et al. in a more youthful generation…]/[improves the yield of…]. We now have added a phrase into the Abstract ( page 2 line 5, and paragraph towards the conversation part ( web web web page 15 starting line 8), to make clear this.
Reviewer: highlights a mistake in your paper